Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Steam is cracking down on porn games, to keep Payment Processors happy.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Steam is cracking down on porn games, to keep Payment Processors happy.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
games
295 Posts 149 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #109
    The problem is that they are a cartel, so we get in a place where a group of private businesses can dictate who can make money. I think it's a great idea in theory that as a payment processor you can have influence on social changes. I think businesses should have clear ethics so that I can support those that match my own. If there were 50 processors to choose from that all had niches and different ethics, fine. But we have in reality one processor with finger puppets on asking us which puppet we like best.
    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • ? Guest
      Steam should accept bitcoin or some other crypto as default for all titles and only use card for "safe" titles Steam users are mostly tech savvy enough to do it
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #110
      Still waiting for NANO to become widespread 💀
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest
        Payment processors should not be allowed to dictate what content they allow to be bought and what not. It's not their job to police people, let me live ffs
        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #111
        Here's what i think is likely. For one reason or another, they get excessive refund/chargeback requests regarding these types of titles and decided to act as they don't think it's profitable. I don't think they care what so ever what you buy, as long as it's profitable for them.
        ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest
          If the US used something like pix, MasterCard, visa, etc wouldn't have any power to do this, but they are wanting to make Brazil delete pix from existing. Interesting.
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          wrote last edited by
          #112
          The central bank facilitating electronic cash flow makes so much more sense than letting random foreign corporations siphon billions in profit they clearly don't deserve in the slightest from your economy. Good on Brazil for breaking free. There's finally been some push here in the EU for EPI/Wero, but progress has been frigid and online payment processing remains extremely fragmented to the point that if I buy something online outside the Benelux with a small vendor, chances are very high I will have to fall back to an American payment processor, which is insane.
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest
            ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/3d4d3bb4-67c7-40fd-9458-238f50f665f2.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/18ca679a-096b-45d5-8c80-c92e1a360a84.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/e6f2a7ff-0f8b-450e-9349-7d73de00ac55.jpeg) [Source](https://bsky.app/profile/steamdb.info/post/3lu32vdlsmg27).
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #113
            ![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/419517ba-db80-41f2-adc5-4415c4ed1250.jpeg)
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest
              It's porn. We can focus on more important things billionaires are ruining.
              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Guest
              wrote last edited by
              #114
              It's not about porn, It's about corporations dictating what type of content can be sold. You may not care about porn but what if they were to start going after LGBT stuff or something like that?
              ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • ? Guest
                ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/3d4d3bb4-67c7-40fd-9458-238f50f665f2.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/18ca679a-096b-45d5-8c80-c92e1a360a84.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/e6f2a7ff-0f8b-450e-9349-7d73de00ac55.jpeg) [Source](https://bsky.app/profile/steamdb.info/post/3lu32vdlsmg27).
                Hal-5700XH This user is from outside of this forum
                Hal-5700XH This user is from outside of this forum
                Hal-5700X
                wrote last edited by
                #115
                Payment processors and financial institutions sure do seem to hold disproportionate amounts of power.
                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • skullgrid@lemmy.worldS skullgrid@lemmy.world
                  On the one hand, oh noz, the incest games. Who will live without the low effort AI goon crap? On the other hand, why do the payment companies get to dictate what sales are made? It's my fucking money, or my fucking store. It's not the job of the payment processors to determine if I'm buying illegal goods, just that the money goes from me to the store.
                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Guest
                  wrote last edited by
                  #116
                  As a form of protest, we should all start scooping up incest porn games.
                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • B but_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
                    Gamers on Lemmy think Steam is THEIR corporation and Gabe is THEIR billionaire. You get downvoted for criticizing steam for anything, or even pointing out that they’re a corporation run by a billionaire and they don’t actually care about you.
                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #117
                    This is why I've been buying games on GOG that I have on Steam. Backups in case Gabe or a successor goes off the deep end
                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V verilyfemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                      Oh shit, I saw that the original Leisure Suit Larry games are no longer for sale... wonder if this is why?
                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Guest
                      wrote last edited by
                      #118
                      Naw. That's a rights issue, however they are available on GOG.
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ? Guest
                        ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/3d4d3bb4-67c7-40fd-9458-238f50f665f2.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/18ca679a-096b-45d5-8c80-c92e1a360a84.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/e6f2a7ff-0f8b-450e-9349-7d73de00ac55.jpeg) [Source](https://bsky.app/profile/steamdb.info/post/3lu32vdlsmg27).
                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Guest
                        wrote last edited by
                        #119
                        Or maybe using the payment processor's TOS allows them to remove pervy Ai horseshit without having to mod their own TOS. Slam dunk, frankly:
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                          >why should they be forced to process payments that facilitate things against their beliefs? You'll excuse me for thinking this means you think corporate beliefs are more important than the social benefits of neutral financial institutions. To answer your question again without assuming anything about your opinion: they should be forced to process payments because they don't have beliefs, it's better for society if financial institutions only look at the business relevant portions of a business, and a legal obligation is perfectly sufficient to protect their business interests in reputation management. All the same reasons we don't let shipping companies refuse customers for morality reasons.
                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Guest
                          wrote last edited by
                          #120
                          financial institutions are just like any other company, the only issue the feds try to protect them
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ? Guest
                            ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/3d4d3bb4-67c7-40fd-9458-238f50f665f2.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/18ca679a-096b-45d5-8c80-c92e1a360a84.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/e6f2a7ff-0f8b-450e-9349-7d73de00ac55.jpeg) [Source](https://bsky.app/profile/steamdb.info/post/3lu32vdlsmg27).
                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Guest
                            wrote last edited by
                            #121
                            Or maybe using the payment processor's TOS allows them to remove pervy Ai horseshit without having to mod their own TOS. Slam dunk, frankly.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ? Guest
                              Eh, it *sounds* like a good idea that incest games are getting removed.
                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Guest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #122
                              how does that sound like a good idea?
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                                >why should they be forced to process payments that facilitate things against their beliefs? You'll excuse me for thinking this means you think corporate beliefs are more important than the social benefits of neutral financial institutions. To answer your question again without assuming anything about your opinion: they should be forced to process payments because they don't have beliefs, it's better for society if financial institutions only look at the business relevant portions of a business, and a legal obligation is perfectly sufficient to protect their business interests in reputation management. All the same reasons we don't let shipping companies refuse customers for morality reasons.
                                I This user is from outside of this forum
                                I This user is from outside of this forum
                                iamthetot@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote last edited by
                                #123
                                What if these payment processors have decided it's bad business for them to process payments for incest porn games?
                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ? Guest
                                  It does extend to others since they put animated, innocent "kid-friendly" looking porn on imageboards. And yes it's akin to beastialty which is vile. Why else would you dress up like an animal?
                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Guest
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #124
                                  why shouldn't people be allowed to make artistic choices when drawing pornography?
                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ? Guest
                                    Bitcoin has [lightning](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network) or you could use a chain with faster blocks.
                                    skullgrid@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    skullgrid@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    skullgrid@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #125
                                    >Lightning Labs launched the Lightning Network in 2018 with the goal of reducing the cost and time required for cryptocurrency transaction. Specifically, the bitcoin blockchain can only process around 7 transactions per second (compared to Visa Inc., which can process around 24,000 transactions per second). Despite initial enthusiasm for the Lightning Network, reports on social media of failed transactions, security vulnerabilities, and over-complication lead to a decline in interest.
                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ? Guest
                                      ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/3d4d3bb4-67c7-40fd-9458-238f50f665f2.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/18ca679a-096b-45d5-8c80-c92e1a360a84.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/e6f2a7ff-0f8b-450e-9349-7d73de00ac55.jpeg) [Source](https://bsky.app/profile/steamdb.info/post/3lu32vdlsmg27).
                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Guest
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #126
                                      First they came for the incestuous porn Then they came for the furries Then they came for games with violence Then...
                                      ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ? Guest
                                        Here's what i think is likely. For one reason or another, they get excessive refund/chargeback requests regarding these types of titles and decided to act as they don't think it's profitable. I don't think they care what so ever what you buy, as long as it's profitable for them.
                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Guest
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #127
                                        I wish that was the case. It's mostly just extreme right lobbying groups like Focus on the Family and the Alliance Defending Freedom, the same groups that control the far right, exert colonial control over impoverished African countries, and generally make the world a worse place for everyone. The same groups that manufactured cases to screw up Dobbs, Wedding cake lawsuits, and death penalty laws for LGBTQ citizens of Uganda.
                                        ? ? ? 3 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ? Guest
                                          ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/3d4d3bb4-67c7-40fd-9458-238f50f665f2.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/18ca679a-096b-45d5-8c80-c92e1a360a84.jpeg) ![](https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/e6f2a7ff-0f8b-450e-9349-7d73de00ac55.jpeg) [Source](https://bsky.app/profile/steamdb.info/post/3lu32vdlsmg27).
                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Guest
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #128
                                          Wait a minute, PayPal is pulling puritanical bullshit again? Did they learn nothing from the last time they tried that?
                                          ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 8
                                          • 9
                                          • 10
                                          • 11
                                          • 12
                                          • 13
                                          • 14
                                          • 15
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups