Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Seven Months After Civ VII’s Launch, Firaxis Workers Are Being Laid Off
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Seven Months After Civ VII’s Launch, Firaxis Workers Are Being Laid Off

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
6 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Guest
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    Archive: https://archive.ph/2025.09.05-021437/https://aftermath.site/civilization-7-civ-vii-layoffs-firaxis-2k-take-two
    ? D 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • GamesG Games shared this topic
    • ? Guest
      Archive: https://archive.ph/2025.09.05-021437/https://aftermath.site/civilization-7-civ-vii-layoffs-firaxis-2k-take-two
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #2
      I have thousands of hours in Civ 6, but Civ 7 has Denuvo, so Civ 7 isn't even in consideration for me. I bet I'm not the only one. I'm sure the game has plenty of other issues, but Denuvo is such a non-starter
      ? ? P 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest
        I have thousands of hours in Civ 6, but Civ 7 has Denuvo, so Civ 7 isn't even in consideration for me. I bet I'm not the only one. I'm sure the game has plenty of other issues, but Denuvo is such a non-starter
        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote last edited by
        #3
        Absolutely the same. I think a more complex strategy game probably gets hit harder by people with our thought process then say COD.
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest
          I have thousands of hours in Civ 6, but Civ 7 has Denuvo, so Civ 7 isn't even in consideration for me. I bet I'm not the only one. I'm sure the game has plenty of other issues, but Denuvo is such a non-starter
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          Seriously. There are so many good games out there that it takes me zero effort to not play games with denuvo or published by ubisoft. Those are my two criteria which immediately disqualify buying a game for me personally. I’ll simply play something else.
          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • ? Guest
            I have thousands of hours in Civ 6, but Civ 7 has Denuvo, so Civ 7 isn't even in consideration for me. I bet I'm not the only one. I'm sure the game has plenty of other issues, but Denuvo is such a non-starter
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            phen@lemmy.eco.br
            wrote last edited by
            #5
            I skipped it for the same reason at launch. Eventually I dropped windows completely and that was no longer an issue, but I had already moved on. Recently I had an opportunity to play it for a while and I was quite surprised that despite having many flaws, the game also has a ton of good things. Mostly quality of life changes but they improved so many things in relation to civ 6 that it's an absolute shame they butchered the game itself with its main "selling point". If they made a game with all of those changes but without the Eras system it would probably be criticised for not innovating much, but people would be playing it. Personally I'm not necessarily against the Eras system, but the way they implemented it is just the worst. I'm fine with the idea of changing civs every era, but the eras themselves now feel like different matches of a game. Once an era ends, you have to drop anything you didn't finish and start new goals, but everything you did finish will give you powerful buffs in the next era - so you basically need to work into achieving everything every time. There's no room for playing the long game, or doing your own thing. If you set up the game to be so long that each era lasts for 400 turns, then you kinda get back that freedom to do whatever you want (to some extent) - but then by the time you reach the modern era you'll have so many buffs that you win the game before you do anything modern.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ? Guest
              Archive: https://archive.ph/2025.09.05-021437/https://aftermath.site/civilization-7-civ-vii-layoffs-firaxis-2k-take-two
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              Matt
              wrote last edited by
              #6
              Isn't Europa Universalis 4 better then this? From the reviews that I read, the game is in an absoluely bad state.
              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups