A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Ubisoft revenues decline 31.4% to €990m
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byThis post did not contain any content.
-
G Games shared this topic 27 days ago
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byWhatever
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byMaybe if they made some good games instead of cash grabs with game design engineered by committee.
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byBoohoobisoft
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byGarbage company with trash games
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byThe schadenfreude here is delicious, alas the perils of being such a vehemently player-hostile game publisher
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byIt turns out consumers aren't totally mindless drones that just buy whatever you publish because _you're Ubisoft_, Ubisoft. I swear they've been incredibly cocky in recent years while simultaneously producing bad games, and broadcasting their stagnation and unwillingness to take risks.
-
Maybe if they made some good games instead of cash grabs with game design engineered by committee.wrote 27 days ago last edited byUbisoft: Best I can do is another Assassins Creed crammed with micro transactions and bloat ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯
-
It turns out consumers aren't totally mindless drones that just buy whatever you publish because _you're Ubisoft_, Ubisoft. I swear they've been incredibly cocky in recent years while simultaneously producing bad games, and broadcasting their stagnation and unwillingness to take risks.wrote 27 days ago last edited byI think about this post from last year a lot: > Navok noted that if a game costs $100 million to make over five years, it has to beat what the company could have returned investing a similar amount in the stock market over the same period. https://gameworldobserver.com/2024/05/24/square-enix-final-fantasy-unrealistic-sales-targets-jacob-navok
-
wrote 27 days ago last edited byIt’s sad because this company used to make good games.
-
wrote 26 days ago last edited byWhat baffles me is how they intentionally make their games unplayable on Linux, and the same can be said about EA.
-
I think about this post from last year a lot: > Navok noted that if a game costs $100 million to make over five years, it has to beat what the company could have returned investing a similar amount in the stock market over the same period. https://gameworldobserver.com/2024/05/24/square-enix-final-fantasy-unrealistic-sales-targets-jacob-navokwrote 26 days ago last edited by... If he wants to be a hedge fund exec, he should just go do that. The point of a business, contrary to the Chicago School MBA nonsense, is not to generate profit. It is to make a good or service that would otherwise be impractical for an individual, in a financially sustainable manner.
-
Garbage company with trash gameswrote 26 days ago last edited byTower slop
-
wrote 26 days ago last edited byOne of the biggest video game publishers in the world and they still can't seem to get good voice actors, animators, writers, or general game designers. We talk about AI slop, well Ubisoft make video game slop. Quantity over quality, get a new entry in [popular series] out every year, milk the shit out of it with mtx and force shitty DRM on consumers. Fuck Ubisoft. Genuinely wouldn't even waste storage by pirating their games.
-
It’s sad because this company used to make good games.wrote 26 days ago last edited byI think their only good modern game is Anno 1800 and that is soon a 5 year old game.
-
I think their only good modern game is Anno 1800 and that is soon a 5 year old game.wrote 26 days ago last edited byA few people said that last year’s Prince of Persia game was pretty good. But I didn’t play it. The 90s and 00s version of U soft was phenomenal. Remember the original Far Cry, Prince of Persia: Sands of Time, and Rayman? Everyone loved those games, and they were actually innovative. But now Ubisoft is formulaic and seems hostile towards the people who buy their games.
-
One of the biggest video game publishers in the world and they still can't seem to get good voice actors, animators, writers, or general game designers. We talk about AI slop, well Ubisoft make video game slop. Quantity over quality, get a new entry in [popular series] out every year, milk the shit out of it with mtx and force shitty DRM on consumers. Fuck Ubisoft. Genuinely wouldn't even waste storage by pirating their games.wrote 26 days ago last edited byThe real cost of Ubisoft games is your time
-
... If he wants to be a hedge fund exec, he should just go do that. The point of a business, contrary to the Chicago School MBA nonsense, is not to generate profit. It is to make a good or service that would otherwise be impractical for an individual, in a financially sustainable manner.wrote 26 days ago last edited byMost investors are going to care about what kind of return they're making. It's the capital they provide that pays the paychecks. If you want to do volunteer work on video games -- I have -- then that's not an issue. But typically games are made by paid workers, and those workers won't work without their paychecks. So they're going to need to attract investors.
-
What baffles me is how they intentionally make their games unplayable on Linux, and the same can be said about EA.wrote 26 days ago last edited byWhat part of it baffles you? I don't like it either, but in order for them to get the same level of security on Linux that they do on Windows, they'd have to do all kinds of work embedding their anti cheat in the kernel. I don't know if the license of the kernel even allows for that, but good luck getting Linux users to agree to knowingly installing a rootkit to play a video game.
-
What part of it baffles you? I don't like it either, but in order for them to get the same level of security on Linux that they do on Windows, they'd have to do all kinds of work embedding their anti cheat in the kernel. I don't know if the license of the kernel even allows for that, but good luck getting Linux users to agree to knowingly installing a rootkit to play a video game.wrote 26 days ago last edited by> they'd have to do all kinds of work embedding their anti cheat in the kernel. Prime example here is Rainbow Six Siege, they use Battle-Eye for their anti cheat. Battle-Eye has supported linux since 2021 and all the developers have to do is phone up Battle-Eye and enable Proton support. https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2021/11/supporting-linux-proton-and-the-steam-deck-with-battleye-is-just-an-email-away/ Ridiculous right?