Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Ever since I decided I should "learn more about the stock market" I've been having a rolling, ongoing multi-week crisis.
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Ever since I decided I should "learn more about the stock market" I've been having a rolling, ongoing multi-week crisis.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
8 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandist
    wrote last edited by futurebird@sauropods.win
    #1

    Ever since I decided I should "learn more about the stock market" I've been having a rolling, ongoing multi-week crisis.

    I'm just... shook.

    "Girl? You live like this?"

    The most interesting thing I've learned is how there are fewer public companies on the market. This is also responsible for market inflation. Everyone seems to nod and agree that ideally a market shouldn't be a speculative thing, but based on the value the companies generate, but everyone vested benefits from dislocation.

    myrmepropagandistF Sean KleefeldS The Flight AttendantC 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

      Ever since I decided I should "learn more about the stock market" I've been having a rolling, ongoing multi-week crisis.

      I'm just... shook.

      "Girl? You live like this?"

      The most interesting thing I've learned is how there are fewer public companies on the market. This is also responsible for market inflation. Everyone seems to nod and agree that ideally a market shouldn't be a speculative thing, but based on the value the companies generate, but everyone vested benefits from dislocation.

      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
      myrmepropagandist
      wrote last edited by futurebird@sauropods.win
      #2

      The whole pretext is that public companies provide the capital that allow companies to take on large projects and make money. This makes their stock worth owning since they will give you some of the profit in the form of a dividend.

      This description of markets is so quaint and out of line with what is really going on that when I say it people don't respond, they just start hyperventilating and laughing.

      But, come on! Isn't that supposed to be the whole point?

      I'm so disappointed.

      SewBlueS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

        Ever since I decided I should "learn more about the stock market" I've been having a rolling, ongoing multi-week crisis.

        I'm just... shook.

        "Girl? You live like this?"

        The most interesting thing I've learned is how there are fewer public companies on the market. This is also responsible for market inflation. Everyone seems to nod and agree that ideally a market shouldn't be a speculative thing, but based on the value the companies generate, but everyone vested benefits from dislocation.

        Sean KleefeldS This user is from outside of this forum
        Sean KleefeldS This user is from outside of this forum
        Sean Kleefeld
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @futurebird When I was working on my MBA, one of the most difficult classes for me was the one where we were learning about annual reports, balance sheets, company valuations, etc. I happened to have been friends with the professor beforehand, and when i mentioned I was having difficulty, she said, "Yes, I expected that. People like you often do. You're very analytical. You want 2 + 2 to always equal 4." It turns out that they make 2+ 2 equal whatever the hell they feel like, and just use accounting obfuscation to justify it.

        none gender with left politicsV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist shared this topic
        • Sean KleefeldS Sean Kleefeld

          @futurebird When I was working on my MBA, one of the most difficult classes for me was the one where we were learning about annual reports, balance sheets, company valuations, etc. I happened to have been friends with the professor beforehand, and when i mentioned I was having difficulty, she said, "Yes, I expected that. People like you often do. You're very analytical. You want 2 + 2 to always equal 4." It turns out that they make 2+ 2 equal whatever the hell they feel like, and just use accounting obfuscation to justify it.

          none gender with left politicsV This user is from outside of this forum
          none gender with left politicsV This user is from outside of this forum
          none gender with left politics
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @SKleefeld @futurebird So...lying? Institutionalized lying?

          Sean KleefeldS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • none gender with left politicsV none gender with left politics

            @SKleefeld @futurebird So...lying? Institutionalized lying?

            Sean KleefeldS This user is from outside of this forum
            Sean KleefeldS This user is from outside of this forum
            Sean Kleefeld
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @vikxin @futurebird Yup.

            In another class, we studied the Enron scandal as that was still recent-ish. The professor flatly said the big lesson companies took from it was: always have a designated fall guy. Literally. Not "be more ethical" or even "cover your tracks better" but "make sure to have someone just below the C-suite execs to take the blame if/when your illegalities are discovered."

            I was a cynic before, but studying business showed me a whole new depth of how blatantly corrupt the business world is. And that was nearly 20 years ago; I'm sure it's worse now.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

              The whole pretext is that public companies provide the capital that allow companies to take on large projects and make money. This makes their stock worth owning since they will give you some of the profit in the form of a dividend.

              This description of markets is so quaint and out of line with what is really going on that when I say it people don't respond, they just start hyperventilating and laughing.

              But, come on! Isn't that supposed to be the whole point?

              I'm so disappointed.

              SewBlueS This user is from outside of this forum
              SewBlueS This user is from outside of this forum
              SewBlue
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @futurebird It's not made sense to me either.

              As a company, I sell stock once, and in return I need to pay a form a sort of interest payment, a dividend, paid in perpetuity, with a crap ton of rules and regulations now guiding my operations? It's not a loan or a bond, but still a form of debt. I got the cash infusion one,

              It makes zero for most corporations except for the people who become rich off the process. Obligations for a cash infusion that may have occurred a generation ago, or more.

              It makes sense for an operation with massive infastructure needs, where the capital needs are huge. Shipping, railroads, electricity etc. For a company with mostly IP? Someone got rich.

              It is a leash on a corporation, to allow an outsider to profit from someone else's work effort.

              myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • SewBlueS SewBlue

                @futurebird It's not made sense to me either.

                As a company, I sell stock once, and in return I need to pay a form a sort of interest payment, a dividend, paid in perpetuity, with a crap ton of rules and regulations now guiding my operations? It's not a loan or a bond, but still a form of debt. I got the cash infusion one,

                It makes zero for most corporations except for the people who become rich off the process. Obligations for a cash infusion that may have occurred a generation ago, or more.

                It makes sense for an operation with massive infastructure needs, where the capital needs are huge. Shipping, railroads, electricity etc. For a company with mostly IP? Someone got rich.

                It is a leash on a corporation, to allow an outsider to profit from someone else's work effort.

                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
                myrmepropagandist
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @sewblue

                Consider a tax on speculative gains that starts high and decreases the longer you hold a stock. All the way to zero. (and to be nice it’d only be on gains over some fat threshold say 100k)

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

                  Ever since I decided I should "learn more about the stock market" I've been having a rolling, ongoing multi-week crisis.

                  I'm just... shook.

                  "Girl? You live like this?"

                  The most interesting thing I've learned is how there are fewer public companies on the market. This is also responsible for market inflation. Everyone seems to nod and agree that ideally a market shouldn't be a speculative thing, but based on the value the companies generate, but everyone vested benefits from dislocation.

                  The Flight AttendantC This user is from outside of this forum
                  The Flight AttendantC This user is from outside of this forum
                  The Flight Attendant
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @futurebird I remember learning in high school economics that the stock market ran on "confidence" and have forever remained shook.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0

                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups