Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Are there examples of passing a law that says you can't pass any laws about something for ten years where that worked?
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Are there examples of passing a law that says you can't pass any laws about something for ten years where that worked?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
    myrmepropagandist
    wrote last edited by futurebird@sauropods.win
    #1

    Are there examples of passing a law that says you can't pass any laws about something for ten years where that worked? Like. Can you even do that?

    I'm not talking about Constitutions, which are generally what we call the documents that are the "laws about how the laws may work" but rather just saying "you can't make a law about X" (literally possibly) and that being at all binding.

    I think one could just pass a law anyway and then argue in court. Seems weak.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • myrmepropagandistF myrmepropagandist

      Are there examples of passing a law that says you can't pass any laws about something for ten years where that worked? Like. Can you even do that?

      I'm not talking about Constitutions, which are generally what we call the documents that are the "laws about how the laws may work" but rather just saying "you can't make a law about X" (literally possibly) and that being at all binding.

      I think one could just pass a law anyway and then argue in court. Seems weak.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #2
      IIUC the way painting the legislation into such a corner has been tried in some places, and accomplished in fewer of them, by passing a law that makes it severely illegal (like, criminal) to defend the position one wants to rule out, so that even legislators would be criminals before they could pass an opposing law
      myrmepropagandistF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ? Guest
        IIUC the way painting the legislation into such a corner has been tried in some places, and accomplished in fewer of them, by passing a law that makes it severely illegal (like, criminal) to defend the position one wants to rule out, so that even legislators would be criminals before they could pass an opposing law
        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandistF This user is from outside of this forum
        myrmepropagandist
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @lxo

        This is like saying "no backs" when playing cooties.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups