A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
You have fucked around. Time to find out
-
That's better communicated through... communication. I don't know about you, but if I were playing a game to win and my "opponent" reveals that they can just cheat and instakill me whenever they feel like, I'm more likely to just stop playing the game than to try to play it for fun. Even if I *did* try to play it for fun, it would be hard to really enjoy it when I know that any encounter can just be a big middle finger. If you don't explicitly tell people what they're doing wrong and how to fix it, it's unlikely that they'll figure it out on their own.> opponent ??? when is the DM an opponent?
-
> opponent ??? when is the DM an opponent?
-
Never, hence the air quotes. It's an analogy. I've been over this already with someone else.> opponent yet you don't use airquotes elsewhere. you really think the DM is a rival to the players, it shows in the shit you're writing out. imho, you've been playing the game wrong for a long time. you need to stop thinking of the DM as some counter to your players and instead think of them as an orchestra conductor. I shouldn't have to explain this shit to you either. you're either being willfully ignorant or motivated to start some shit. not my monkeys,not my circus.
-
> opponent yet you don't use airquotes elsewhere. you really think the DM is a rival to the players, it shows in the shit you're writing out. imho, you've been playing the game wrong for a long time. you need to stop thinking of the DM as some counter to your players and instead think of them as an orchestra conductor. I shouldn't have to explain this shit to you either. you're either being willfully ignorant or motivated to start some shit. not my monkeys,not my circus.
-
@mojofrododojo Maybe it's a client issue ? Because I see the quotes
https://lemmy.world/post/30340298/17319855 -
It's just an analogy. Here; let me try one more time. If you're playing a horde shooter and your friend reveals they can just spawn a boss on top of you at any time, it kind of kills your desire to keep playing - at least with them. No offense, but you seem overly fixated on all the wrong things.you still don't get it. you must be a miserable person to RPG with.
-
https://lemmy.world/post/30340298/17319855
-
you still don't get it. you must be a miserable person to RPG with.I guess I should stop using analogies then. The point isn't whether the players are competing with the DM. The point is that there's two people playing a game and one person can just screw over the other whenever they feel like it. Painting that in a competitive setting hits closer to home for a lot of people since they're more likely to have experienced that themselves. It wasn't meant to be indicative of how I perceive a good player/DM relationship. I'm sorry, I had no idea it would confuse so many people so badly.
-
I guess I should stop using analogies then. The point isn't whether the players are competing with the DM. The point is that there's two people playing a game and one person can just screw over the other whenever they feel like it. Painting that in a competitive setting hits closer to home for a lot of people since they're more likely to have experienced that themselves. It wasn't meant to be indicative of how I perceive a good player/DM relationship. I'm sorry, I had no idea it would confuse so many people so badly.> The point isn’t whether the players are competing with the DM. you've made it abundantly clear you believe this, and then double down by following it up with: > there’s two people playing a game and one person can just screw over the other whenever they feel like it. the DM is not there to 'screw over' the other players, and the players aren't there to 'beat' the dm. Have you ever actually played a TTRPG? I'm beginning to wonder if anyone would even sit at a table with you.
-
@mojofrododojo Yes, this is exactly the response I screenshoted. It has quotes, unicode of said quotes are U+201C before and U+201D after.
 ah huh -
> The point isn’t whether the players are competing with the DM. you've made it abundantly clear you believe this, and then double down by following it up with: > there’s two people playing a game and one person can just screw over the other whenever they feel like it. the DM is not there to 'screw over' the other players, and the players aren't there to 'beat' the dm. Have you ever actually played a TTRPG? I'm beginning to wonder if anyone would even sit at a table with you.Do you understand the context of the discussion? Maybe I'm in the minority here, but to me I'd consider throwing a god-level NPC at your players explicitly to punish them for their behavior to fall pretty squarely under "screwing them over". Not to say players should be allowed to do whatever they want, but I'd expect a smoother escalation than that.
-
Do you understand the context of the discussion? Maybe I'm in the minority here, but to me I'd consider throwing a god-level NPC at your players explicitly to punish them for their behavior to fall pretty squarely under "screwing them over". Not to say players should be allowed to do whatever they want, but I'd expect a smoother escalation than that.> Maybe I’m in the minority here, but to me I’d consider throwing a god-level NPC at your players explicitly to punish them for their behavior to fall pretty squarely under “screwing them over”. yeah obviously that's how you see it because you only see things one way, throughout this entire convo. I get that. the rest of us playing ttrpg's don't see it as 'oh they've sent punishment' - no, the dm is tailoring the world to react to the player's shenanigans. should the DM just drop everything and cater to whatever whims the PCs devise? you really don't understand any of this shit.
-
> Maybe I’m in the minority here, but to me I’d consider throwing a god-level NPC at your players explicitly to punish them for their behavior to fall pretty squarely under “screwing them over”. yeah obviously that's how you see it because you only see things one way, throughout this entire convo. I get that. the rest of us playing ttrpg's don't see it as 'oh they've sent punishment' - no, the dm is tailoring the world to react to the player's shenanigans. should the DM just drop everything and cater to whatever whims the PCs devise? you really don't understand any of this shit.If that's the expectation that's been set up for the table, sure. But jumping straight from murderhobo shenanigans to "Ok here's a god to stop you, roll initiative" isn't the way I'd handle people playing the game in a way I don't like. I've been over this all already with another poster; it causes problems and might not even solve the ones you're using it to solve.
-
If that's the expectation that's been set up for the table, sure. But jumping straight from murderhobo shenanigans to "Ok here's a god to stop you, roll initiative" isn't the way I'd handle people playing the game in a way I don't like. I've been over this all already with another poster; it causes problems and might not even solve the ones you're using it to solve.never dm'd shit but insists they know better. > I’ve been over this all already with another poster; it causes problems and might not even solve the ones you’re using it to solve.
-
never dm'd shit but insists they know better. > I’ve been over this all already with another poster; it causes problems and might not even solve the ones you’re using it to solve.... and now you're making wild assumptions just to discredit my point of view instead of making any actual counterargument. I guess even if you were right (and you aren't) I'll never learn. Not with people like you around who refuse to explain their side of the debate.
