Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Let's not fuck around
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.

Let's not fuck around

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
rpgmemes
7 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
    stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
    stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    ? ? J 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • RPGMemes R RPGMemes shared this topic
    • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      This post did not contain any content.
      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #2
      Much better than the character that nobody trusts after 20 sessions because they keep doing shady shit. As a DM it is required that the players create characters that are able to trust each other and won't do things to each other to create distrust. Sure, have some snarky banter or even come up with something that could cause conflict but you are both on the same page for ahead of time for story reasons.
      stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • ? Guest
        Much better than the character that nobody trusts after 20 sessions because they keep doing shady shit. As a DM it is required that the players create characters that are able to trust each other and won't do things to each other to create distrust. Sure, have some snarky banter or even come up with something that could cause conflict but you are both on the same page for ahead of time for story reasons.
        stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
        stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS This user is from outside of this forum
        stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        wrote last edited by
        #3
        Recently, my character in a Dungeons & Dragons game had committed a terrorism. I wasn't playing about the time. I decided that I was going to play somebody else. But things changed and I wanted my old bird boy back, so I got him back. But due to his committing a terrorism, the rest of the party does have a bit of an issue with trust against him. That being said, that's just role play and for fun. In any time of crisis, there is no hesitation that, Nevermore would have their back. We talk about it, we play with it, but it's never an actual obstacle. And I think that a lot of people don't understand how you can make that happen.
        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          Recently, my character in a Dungeons & Dragons game had committed a terrorism. I wasn't playing about the time. I decided that I was going to play somebody else. But things changed and I wanted my old bird boy back, so I got him back. But due to his committing a terrorism, the rest of the party does have a bit of an issue with trust against him. That being said, that's just role play and for fun. In any time of crisis, there is no hesitation that, Nevermore would have their back. We talk about it, we play with it, but it's never an actual obstacle. And I think that a lot of people don't understand how you can make that happen.
          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          Yeah, some level of conflict is fine as long as it isn't ongoing backstabbing that passes off the other players. Like if someone wanted to be Bender from Futurama and pull a reason out of their ass to do the right thing when it matters and everyone else is cool with it that still counts as trust for me. I guess it is more about the players trusting each other than the characters, but framing it as the characters trusting each other seems to work better at avoiding the characters that lead to interplayer conflict.
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            This post did not contain any content.
            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote last edited by
            #5
            https://youtu.be/sIaIdv79Xz4
            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.comS stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              This post did not contain any content.
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
              wrote last edited by
              #6
              This whole problem is such an archaic D&D-ism. Most other games provide strong guidance or even explicit rules about how to make a party that works. Fate has the "phase trio" where you go around and make up as a group how your characters have a past together. None of this "everyone makes their dude in isolation" nonsense.
              ? 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                This whole problem is such an archaic D&D-ism. Most other games provide strong guidance or even explicit rules about how to make a party that works. Fate has the "phase trio" where you go around and make up as a group how your characters have a past together. None of this "everyone makes their dude in isolation" nonsense.
                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Guest
                wrote last edited by
                #7
                Yeah, this is a major problem with D&D, and has been a problem in multiple campaigns that I've been a part of. There are a lot of players that just don't look at the game from a perspective of making a party to do things together, even though that's obviously what the game is about.
                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups