A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
Did you really think it would be that easy
-
The king is a puppet of a dictatorial deity. The solution is to overthrow god.I tried that. The paladin Divine Smite'd me
-
This post did not contain any content.It seems like any sufficiently rich person, like a monarch, could essentially have someone on staff - maybe multiple people - whose entire job is to periodically cast True Resurrection, naming the rich individual. If they aren't dead, the spell fails; if they are, they come back to life, and can name their assassin.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
The king is a puppet of a dictatorial deity. The solution is to overthrow god.
-
I think they are referring to the No Kings protest going on in the US right now. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/18/us/politics/no-kings-protests-trump.html
-
I think they are referring to the No Kings protest going on in the US right now. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/18/us/politics/no-kings-protests-trump.html
-
Ahh I see, I thought there'd been some kind of new attempt on somebody's life
Living under a rock these days, sorry!To be fair, I'm not american, and the first thing I thought was "has there been another attempt at Trump's life?" lol -
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.If this king doesn't have access to wizards casting every defensive spell in the player's handbook on him every single day of his life, wearing the best magical armor in the world that glamors into ordinary royal attire, with defensive wards cast around his immediate vicinity every day, and he just let adventurers stroll into his castle armed while he was being lax with all these precautions, then he deserves to get Kirked.
-
The king is a puppet of a dictatorial deity. The solution is to overthrow god.
-
This post did not contain any content.Nobody would rule by birthright in a D&D world. Any leader of a country would have access to Clone, and would have no need for inheritance.
-
It seems like any sufficiently rich person, like a monarch, could essentially have someone on staff - maybe multiple people - whose entire job is to periodically cast True Resurrection, naming the rich individual. If they aren't dead, the spell fails; if they are, they come back to life, and can name their assassin.Or they could just have some Clones.
-
The king is a puppet of a dictatorial deity. The solution is to overthrow god.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
Why what did I do? I phoned it the fuck in
-
Why what did I do? I phoned it the fuck inI think it's lovely
-
Why what did I do? I phoned it the fuck in
-
It seems like any sufficiently rich person, like a monarch, could essentially have someone on staff - maybe multiple people - whose entire job is to periodically cast True Resurrection, naming the rich individual. If they aren't dead, the spell fails; if they are, they come back to life, and can name their assassin.Assuming D&D 5e rules, this is easily countered by casting Gentle Repose on the corpse every 10 days, or any other method of preventing natural decay. True Resurrection can only create a new body if the original no longer exists.
-
Assuming D&D 5e rules, this is easily countered by casting Gentle Repose on the corpse every 10 days, or any other method of preventing natural decay. True Resurrection can only create a new body if the original no longer exists.I guess this comes down to DM fiat as for what constitutes "touching" the creature. For example, what if the person casting the spell had a hair sample, or a severed finger or some other item from the monarch's body, which they were also taking any of those steps to prevent decay of? The [3rd Edition](https://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/trueResurrection.htm) version of the spell is even more ambiguous. RAW, it doesn't prevent you from "unambiguously identifying" the creature through a means other than touching the body even if the body still exists.
