Chebucto Regional Softball Club

FWIW, I have never managed to achieve that fluently. To elegantly switch from "sitting around, planning" to interacting with the world. Retrospections are the only way that works for me

I think that also depends on the tools/rules you can use. If I feel that this unicorn ranch is something only one character is interested in, I would propose a clock. We decide what they want to achieve in the end, efforts are a personal project with one roll per session/adventure, the spotlight can be kept short (remember, one roll in a while). And who knows? Maybe there will be a hook or mcguffin for me to use later on?

I hope it's ok that I don't put links. I think the ones that are from blogs should be easily found * Lazy GM - creates a habit of loosely planning the plot, so you can have a bag of things to use, without having to railroad, and changing the plan because of players' actions doesn't hurt * don't plan plots, plan obstacles - when you get into the habit of thinking what could be an obstacle in a situation, you don't have the game to go this or that way. You only switch between applicable obstacles * onion plots - "who needs what, what for, but they can't because of what". That way coming up with a follow up is easier * run combat like a dolphin - mainly, remember to describe things. Yes, I have to actively remember about doing that * stars and wishes - to me this is the most constructive form of after session summary. If I ask "what you didn't like?" (roses and thorns), to me it is not clear how to improve. When it's about "what you wish/wished for?" it's much easier to decide whether there was a problem with expectation management or maybe a cool idea that I passed up * yes and+no but - mainly, even if we are playing a more trad game, I don't ask for a roll if I (the plot, of course ) need the thing to happen. I ask for it to answer an additional question "will the character do this well enough to uncover additional details?". Unless we are in a simulationist wounds&initiative combat, the roll to me is a plot device, not plain success/failure And thing I came up on my own but might be only because how my mind works: *Do split the party* What I often do is present the obstacle, ask around what the characters are doing after learning that. Then I choose the sequence that I feel has the most meat on it - story to be told and go one by one. Even if an idea surprises me, I've found that by the time another player rolls their dice I already know what to do with the previous one. And when scenes have fewer participants, it's easier to manage spotlight and have lower stakes per scene