Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Darkly)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Chebucto Regional Softball Club

J

jounniy@ttrpg.network

@jounniy@ttrpg.network
A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
About
Posts
16
Topics
1
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    That one has nothing to do with Crawford far as I'm aware. It’s just plain stupid interaction of several rules. You are definetly intended to be able to just cast disintegrate on the wall. Some rules are intended in a certain way and just handled poorly. The above case is (I personally think) one of them. Others are actually intended to work a certain way because of designing aspects (like verbal components having to be said at a normal volume) but simply people decide to ditch them anyway, because they like something else better. Both are valid, but they are different.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    Oh dear I didn’t even know that. Well that makes it even more absurd.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    I’d argue that RAW the wall is still invisible. You now just have the means to pinpoint it's location.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    Funnily enough, Shatter actually has a very easy solution: Objects just take the damage and that’s it.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    I actually think it’s a fair restriction for spells that require sight. It imposes a somewhat interesting limit on casters, especially since a lot of spells still do something on a miss.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    Yeah I thought of that one as well. It’s one of those weird cases of imprecise wording.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    As I have said in another comment, that is RAW not what would happen: "You can’t even cast it on something behind the wall, because you cannot target something (or someone) with a spell if they are behind total cover. Total cover is created by being behind completely behind an obstacle (like a wall). This counts even if the obstacle is invisible." Furthermore, because if you chose an invalid target for a spell, you’d still expend the spellslot but there would be no effect. So you actually spend a sixth level spell a lot to achieve nothing." It’s very much not RAI I'd say and I would likely handle exactly like you described, but the RAW was so wonky that I wanted to make the meme when I found out about it.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    Yes. See invisibility should work as well. Both are quite annoying to activate when in a fight though.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    It’s technically still invisible. But as there is not clear rule for that I'd say it’s up to interpretation.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    No. If we assume that you have to target the wall it would at the very least stop after destroying the wall. But by RAW, you can’t even cast it on something behind the wall, because you cannot target something (or someone) with a spell if they are behind total cover. Total cover is created by being behind completely behind an obstacle (like a wall). This counts even if the obstacle is invisible. Furthermore, because if you chose an invalid target for a spell, you'd still expend the spellslot but there would be no effect. So you actually spend a sixth level spell a lot to achieve nothing. I would not recommend doing it this way, but that’s what the rules say.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    Oh definetly. I assume that RAI this is the intention.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • This definetly seem very intentional…
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    This post did not contain any content.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • DnD Parties when they can't fight the encounter...
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    The the theoretical problem just solved itself. Neat. Thanks.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • Tales From the Tables ep.54: Free Magic Item!
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    I think I don't get what book this is supposed to be.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • "Rescue Quest" (Art by Soli)
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    At first I thought the inhale was a "Oh shit we're cooked." Then I realized it was "Oh shit this is gonna be annoying.".
    Uncategorized rpgmemes

  • DnD Parties when they can't fight the encounter...
    J jounniy@ttrpg.network
    I know that it would be out of character, but now I'm trying to make up a plan how this might work. If Mystery can counterspell, then if you send him along while disguised as someone else, it might be possible. However, as you've said, it would not really accomplish much anyway and Konsi would never do it.
    Uncategorized rpgmemes
  • 1 / 1
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
Powered by NodeBB Contributors
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups