A forum for discussing and organizing recreational softball and baseball games and leagues in the greater Halifax area.
EA’s latest The Sims 4 patch is making everyone pregnant, including the men and the chaste
-
I wouldn't be surprised. Even though it's one of EA's main cash cows pretty much every Sims game and expansion is held together with the programming equivalent of ducktape and bailing wire.
-
You might dent the baby sim's head!
-
¿Can U get... *prrrreganté?*
-
Men could get pregnant in Sims 4 for awhile, I think. I guess the bug is it that neighborhood stories aren't working and checking if someone is in a relationship and has the 'can be pregnant' tag.
-
FYI, the Sims 4 version is Wicked Whims. But I find mods in generally have become difficult to maintain since EA starting putting out a new patch seemingly every week.
-
Okay, this is something I'm going to have to test. This article left me with more questions than answers, especially when the writer claimed that pregnant sims can't woohoo or take a pregnancy test. I can't tell if they mean *since this patch* pregnant sims can't do those things, or if they haven't played the game enough to know. The fact there's a question mark in parentheses doesn't help. Also, the screenshot showing a child not be able to do something because they're "pregnant" doesn't necessarily mean the sim is pregnant - it could well be a bug related to how the menu is displayed, which sounds possible since it seems to be occuring across the board. The article is about sims being *pregnant*, but not about them *having babies,* and I find that an odd distinction. But I have this game, and the patch is already downloaded. Let's see if I'm a lucky winner and this bug shows up. To game for science!
-
You might dent the baby sim's head!You would just get poked with the green diamond on the top of the head
-
lmao it wasn't even a full year ago: https://dotesports.com/the-sims/news/a-horrifying-sims-4-bug-is-turning-players-children-into-pregnant-bodybuilders February!
-
Yup! But I think men had to be abducted by aliens and he'd show up preggo with an alien baby some days later. I don't think it was possible to impregnate women sims this way, but I may be misremembering.
-
https://www.bostonmagazine.com/arts-entertainment/2016/10/18/puritans-and-sex-myth/ >Debunking the Myth Surrounding Puritans and Sex > >The Puritans weren't prudish. In fact, they were passionate. >From the beginning, Puritans maintained sexual intercourse was necessary for procreation, but also asserted sex was an important way for couples to bond in a loving relationship. > >“They talk about the duty to desire, that you’re supposed to engage in intercourse with your married partner and that this is good,” says Bremer. “There will actually be some people in early New England who are censured by the church because they have deprived their married partner of sex for three months or more and this is seen as bad.”>“There will actually be some people in early New England who are censured by the church because they have deprived their married partner of sex for three months or more and this is seen as bad.” Bet I can guess the gender of the people who were censured...
-
Honestly, not even that bad lol
-
>“There will actually be some people in early New England who are censured by the church because they have deprived their married partner of sex for three months or more and this is seen as bad.” Bet I can guess the gender of the people who were censured...I'm assuming that you're guessing "female"? https://sexualityandthecity.com/2016/11/26/when-women-wanted-sex-much-more-than-men/ >In the 1600s, a man named James Mattock was expelled from the First Church of Boston. His crime? It wasn’t using lewd language or smiling on the Sabbath or anything else that we might think the Puritans had disapproved of. Rather, James Mattock had refused to have sex with his wife for two years. Looking at other sources, the excommunication was in 1640.
